02903nas a2200229 4500008004100000245014300041210007100184260001600255300001400271520215000285653002802435653001102463653002602474653002602500653001402526653001302540653001402553100001602567700002502583700002202608856004302630 2015 eng d00aInfiltration of a facultative ant–plant mutualism by the introduced Argentine ant: effects on mutualist diversity and mutualism benefits0 aInfiltration of a facultative ant–plant mutualism by the introdu cJan-04-2015 an/a - n/a3 a

1. Ant–plant mutualisms have been the focus of considerable empirical research, but few studies have investigated how introduced ants affect these interactions. Using 2 years of survey data, this study examines how the introduced Argentine ant [Linepithema humile(Mayr)] differs from native ants with respect to its ability to protect the extrafloral nectary-bearing coast barrel cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) in Southern California.

2. Eighteen native ant species visited cacti in uninvaded areas, but cacti in invaded areas were primarily visited by the Argentine ant. The main herbivore of the coast barrel cactus present at the study sites is a leaf-footed bug (Narnia wilsoni).

3. Herbivore presence (the fraction of surveys in which leaf-footed bugs were present on individual cacti) was negatively related to ant presence (the fraction of surveys in which ants were present on individual cacti). Compared with cacti in uninvaded areas, those in invaded areas were less likely to have herbivores and when they did had them less often.

4. Seed mass was negatively related to herbivore presence, and this relationship did not differ for cacti in invaded areas versus those in uninvaded areas.

5. Although the Argentine ant might provide superior protection from herbivores, invasion-induced reductions in ant mutualist diversity could potentially compromise plant reproduction. The cumulative number of ant species on individual cacti over time was lower in invaded areas and was associated with a shortened seasonal duration of ant protection and reduced seed mass. These results support the hypothesis that multiple partners may enhance mutualism benefits.

 

10aAnt–plant interaction10acactus10aextrafloral nectaries10afacultative mutualism10aherbivory10ainvasion10amutualist1 aLUDKA, JOHN1 aLEVAN, KATHERINE, E.1 aHolway, David, A. uhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/een.12206